Paper Airplane Time

May 31, 2012 Investors bail from stock mutual funds (again): Chris Mayer on how we’ve been here before, and why it’s no reason to give up on stocks altogether
A trio of disappointments: jobs, GDP, Midwest business activity
Hopscotching the world: One of Asia’s wealthiest men spots a bigger trend than China’s “hard landing”… while Jeffrey Tucker waxes on the vibrancy of Brazil
Gluing the neighbor’s locks to keep the neighborhood nice… Readers unload on fellow readers who insist they “paid in” to Social Security… a special notice for readers of Addison’s Apogee Advisory… and more!
Gosh, could it be the Facebook effect?

Investors yanked $7.02 billion out of stock mutual funds last week, according to the Investment Company Institute. That’s the most since the first week of 2012.

Domestic stock funds account for nearly all of the outflow; that category has seen net outflows for 14 straight weeks.

The total withdrawn so far this year: $45 billion, which puts us on a pace to easily exceed the $85 billion total for all of last year. But then, this is nothing new. “People have been yanking a lot of money out of the market,” Chris Mayer points out, “something like $1.4 trillion since 2007.”

“Some people will use these outflows,” Chris adds, “to say the market can’t or won’t rise. I think that’s a lot of baloney.”

Chris points to new research from the Leuthold Group. “A new market high could potentially occur with no help at all from the public,” writes Leuthold’s Doug Ramsey.

After all, the S&P more than doubled from its March 2009 low, even as the outflows proceeded apace.

There is precedent for this: the bear market of the 1970s.

You want to talk about “weak volume” and “no public participation” in today’s market? Old-timers like technician Ralph Acampora will regale you with tales of traders flying paper airplanes on the New York Stock Exchange floor in the ’70s — so little trading there was to do.

Within the 1966-82 bear, there was a stretch from 1974-80 when the broad market rose 120%. Small caps did even better.

And within that six-year span, there was a vicious shakeout. “The sharp market declines of mid-2010 and mid-2011,” Leuthold’s Ramsey writes, “have probably served the same purpose as the 1976-77 decline — flushing out retail investors just as they were finally preparing to tiptoe back in.”

“It’s an interesting observation,” says Chris. “Stocks, as a class, then, perhaps are getting a bad rap.”

“People remember the headline-grabbing stories — and usually they are the stocks that blew up. Meanwhile, there are many stocks that just keep plodding along.”

“There are enough companies with good managers and decent businesses that give a fair shake to their owners. On a portfolio basis, such stocks can make the little guy a lot of money over time.”

Chris shares some of his favorites right here.

Meanwhile, the “headline-grabbing stories” bring little joy today.

As we write, U.S. stocks are reversing big losses early in the day on “news” that the International Monetary Fund will spend out of an empty pocket to fill the black hole known as Bankia. That’s a giant and busted Spanish bank cobbled together from a bunch of smaller and busted Spanish banks 18 months ago.

No, the eurozone is no closer to being fixed now than it was a few hours ago… but the S&P has managed to recover 1,300.

(Facebook, meanwhile, could sink below $27 before day’s end. Heh.)

Tomorrow’s market action will be “data-driven”, with the Labor Department’s monthly jobs report issued before the open and the ISM manufacturing survey after.

In a preview of the jobs report, we have the following numbers this morning:

Private-sector jobs: up 133,000 this month, according to the payroll firm ADP. Manufacturing jobs, however, turned in a second straight month of decline
Small-business jobs: up 40,000 in May according to Intuit… but that’s fewer than April’s 60,000. Hours have been cut, too
First-time unemployment claims: up 10,000 last week, to 383,000. That breaks several weeks of stagnant numbers… and in the wrong direction
All of those numbers were worse than the vaunted “expert consensus.”

For further evidence of a U.S. slowdown, we have the Commerce Department’s latest guess on first-quarter GDP.

The initial guess a month ago came in at an annualized 2.2%. This morning, it’s 1.9%.

To complete the trifecta of disappointments, the “Chicago PMI” number, reflecting business activity in the City of Big Shoulders and its environs, came in way below expectations.

At 52.7, it’s still above the 50 dividing line between expansion and contraction. But here too the Street was counting on something much better. The figure is now the lowest since September 2009.

Gold is holding steady after recovering lost ground yesterday. The spot price is currently $1,561.

Silver, however, is still stuck below $28, at $27.79.

Hot money is again flowing into the dollar and Treasuries today. The dollar index just crested 83; the yield on a 10-year T-note is down to… drumroll, please… a record 1.58%.

One of Asia’s wealthiest businessmen isn’t giving up on Chinese real estate yet.

“Li Ka-shing Stays Long on Mainland Property,” reads the headline by Dee Woo, a contributor to the fledgling Chinese edition of The Daily Reckoning, and republished at 文å*¦Ã¥ŸŽ – Ã¥?³Ã¦—¶Ã¦»šÃ¥Š¨Ã¦–°Ã©—», 本地新é—», çƒ*点论å?›, Ã¥?šÃ¥®¢ – — a site read by many affluent Chinese. (You can read a poor English translation at this link.)

At age 83, Li — known in Hong Kong as “Superman” — has an estimated net worth of $25 billion. And despite the talk of a “hard landing” in mainland China, Li is moving full speed ahead with property development there.

The reason? The Chinese central bank is cranking out unlimited quantities of yuan to keep pace with the Fed’s unlimited quantities of dollars. Real estate, in contrast, still has a limited supply… and Li is playing for the long haul.

“Brazil is a marvelous and massive country,” writes Jeffrey Tucker, continuing a quick hopscotch around the world. He’s back from a recent trip speaking to the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil.

It’s a place “where private wealth thrives without embarrassment, where well-protected and healthy familial dynasties form the infrastructure of social and economic life, where technology is popular and beloved by everyone, where the police leave you alone and where Americans can feel right at home.” “My most-surprising findings in Brazil, aside from the amazing fruits that I didn’t know existed because the U.S. government doesn’t think I need them, were the young American kids who have moved here to find economic opportunity. This I had not expected, but now fully understand.”

“The world is changing fast. Freedom in America is slipping away so quickly that we are already seeing a wave of young people leaving in search of new opportunities, just as people from around the world once came to America to live the dream.”

Back in the States, people find themselves resorting to teenage pranks just to keep their neighborhoods from going to hell.

Last fall, someone moved into a vacant foreclosure house in the high-end Palmer Woods section of Detroit. Ordinarily, this would be good news. Unfortunately, he didn’t buy the six-bedroom Tudor revival; he was a squatter.

“Neighbors took matters into their own hands,” says a post at the Consumerist site. “First they got the utility company to cut off gas and electric service to the house.”

Didn’t work. Enter the teenage pranks. “One neighbor spent an entire day placing large rocks in the property’s driveway. Another thought that putting glue in the locks would do the trick.”

In the end, the only thing that worked was the filing of 11 felony counts against the squatter. He stands accused of filing false paperwork claiming ownership of three Detroit properties.

The real estate broker trying to unload the joint says the inside of the house is in fine shape and he expects a bidding war once the house goes up for sale.

Good luck with that: There are 10 vacant homes, says The Detroit News, in a neighborhood of about 300.

“I just got my first $1,600 Social Security check last week,” writes a reader stirring the pot in reply to yesterday’s mailbag. “I am 64 and expect to live to, say, 88. So I am anticipating 24 years x 12 months x $1,600 = $460,800 in government checks.”

“I was self-employed for 40 years and thus earned and put in all of the taxes myself toward Social Security and Medicare. Most of your Social Security crybabies probably only put in half their own payments and had their bosses pay in the other half for them. I believe I paid in around $120,000. Can any of your email complainers that say ‘I am not receiving a government handout, I paid into the system, it hurts my feelings when you speak meanly about me’ do any frigging math?”

“OK, so my first $120k I get back will be my own money I paid in. So ask your ‘feelings hurt crybabies’ where does the rest of my, and their, extra money windfall come from?”

“They neglect to mention they are probably going to receive three times more dinero than they, and their employers, paid in — from their government. ‘Not receiving government handouts?’ My arse.”

“How in the hell can such a badly designed system ever be sustainable?”

“I never got unemployment or any other benefit from any governmental agency, federal, state or local,” writes another.

“Now at age 72, I get Social Security, which represents only a small percentage of the total amount which my employers and I paid into the Social Security fund over the more than 50 years I worked. I did get about $150 per month from the government for serving in the U.S. Army in the U.S. and Korea.”

“I did not sign up for Part B Medicare coverage at age 65 so I now pay about $150 per month for Part B plus about $16 per month for Part D. All in all, considering all the money paid into Social Security and Medicare, my return on investment is the worst of all the investments I ever made except one I made in a company that subsequently went bankrupt.”

“I just pray the Social Security Administration doesn’t do the same. If my Social Security and Medicare benefits are a drain on the U.S. economy, just give me back the money I paid for these benefits and we’ll call it even. By the way, I am still paying into Social Security and Medicare as I write this email.”

“I get a Veteran’s disability pension and soon I’ll be getting Social Security payments. In addition I have a very small computer consulting business that doesn’t earn enough money to pay taxes, but it keeps me supplied with computer equipment and software, which is my hobby/occupation.”

“The VA pension isn’t enough to live on in Southern California, nor would Social Security or my business be. All combined, I just scrape by, and I even was able to earn enough from my business to subscribe to the Equity Reserve, and later on, by selling some gold and silver and a small loan to open a brokerage account, to do some meager investing. (The loan has since been paid back.)”

“While I am partially living on the dole, I have no illusions about where the money comes from. As you and many others have pointed out, the money comes NOT from some fund, but from general revenue. The taxes I paid ‘into the system’ were merely another TAX that went into the same general fund.”

“I also realize that the days of my or anyone receiving these ‘benefits’ (aka stolen money) are numbered not in decades, but in months or even days. So in answer, I’m getting mine while I still can. I am steadily buying precious metals and other valuable goods in preparation for the coming currency collapse.”

“I make no excuses for my ‘larceny, nor do I apologize for it. What others may call entitlements (I paid into it, or I’m poor, etc.) are, in fact, financed by the many taxes, fees and other extortions and the borrowing, which in effect results in the devaluation of the dollar which is ipso facto just another tax of the most insidious sort.”

“It is somewhat sad to realize,” writes our final correspondent, “that there are some who read The 5 Min. Forecast who actually think that they are ‘collecting what is due’ when no such contract exists between the government and you as a payer into the Social Security system.”

“The Social Security Administration owes you nothing regardless of how long or how much you have paid into the system. There are no guarantees you will receive or are entitled to anything. To stress the point, please refer your readers to the Supreme Court case of Flemming v. Nestor in 1960.”

“In its ruling, the Court established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.”

“Also note that Congress can change the law anytime it wants. If anyone thinks that Congress cannot reduce what you think you should get as a ‘government benefit’ or make you pay more into the system, they should think again.”

“While in my 40s, I would have completely agreed with the writer who said he’d be a millionaire if he did not have to pay into the system, I am now nearly 56, and when I finally start receiving ‘what is due,’ I promise to suck as much of those government benefits as they will allow me to until the system collapses.”

The 5: The Social Security Administration was also refreshingly blunt in the “annual statements” it used to send out. “Your estimated benefits are based on current law,” it said in fine print. “Congress has made changes to the law in the past and can do so at any time.”


Dave Gonigam
The 5 Min. Forecast

Martin Weiss: You Are Being Forewarned ? Again ? About an Imminent Financial Megashock!

[You are being forwarned – again – that Europe and the U.S. are now on a collision course with a second Lehman-type megashock….A snowball of events -*bank runs spreading across Europe -*are*bringing us a few steps closer. What [can we expect]*next? Let me explain. Words: 1795

So says*Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. ( in edited (marginally) excerpts from his original article*.
Lorimer Wilson, editor of (Your Key to Making Money!), has edited the article below for length and clarity � see Editor�s Note at the bottom of the page. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Weiss goes on to say, and I quote:

This is not the first time we’ve warned you about an imminent financial megashock.
In our Money and Markets of December 3, 2007, we [forewarned you] specifically naming Lehman Brothers as the next major firm to collapse on Wall Street. (See “Dangerously Close to a Money Panic.”)
In our Money and Markets of March 17, 2008, precisely 182 days before its failure, we [again forewarned you]*naming Lehman, making it abundantly clear that it could be the trigger of a financial meltdown. (See “Closer to a Financial Meltdown.”)
Now, starting with last week’s edition, we are [fore]warning you of ANOTHER Lehman-type megashock.
A new telltale sign bank runs, the final nail in the coffin of any modern economy are spreading among the PIIGS countries of Europe � and possibly beyond.
In Greece it’s already a tsunami � a desperate effort by millions of citizens to get their money out of danger before Greece is forced to leave the euro zone.
In Spain, it’s quickly turning into a flood, as individuals and businesses � with $1.25 trillion in total bank deposits � wonder if their country will be the next to leave the union.
In Portugal, Ireland, Italy or even France, banks are vulnerable to similar outflows and, once the stampede strikes more than two or three major countries, you could see bank runs all across Europe.
[Does all of the above] sound familiar? It should, because last year we witnessed a very similar contagion when investors stampeded from the bonds of the weakest European countries. Much like today, the first to be attacked was Greece, the weakest link in the chain. Then, Spain, Portugal, Italy and even France got hit hard. Soon, nearly all of Europe was infected, prompting its central bankers to suddenly break their solemn vows of monetary piety and print more than $1 trillion worth of new euros but now, despite all those efforts, they’re facing a new contagion of a second kind � by bank depositors.

How Dangerous Are Bank Runs?

Bank runs are far more infectious, and dangerous, than investor stampedes they spill out onto the streets and onto the airwaves and*invoke frightening flashbacks to the Great Depression and they immediately threaten the entire banking system.

According to the New York Times, “the havoc that a stampede might cause to the Continent’s financial system would greatly complicate efforts by European Union officials to fashion a longer-term plan to ease the debt crisis and revive Europe’s economy, because authorities would have to cope with the staggering added costs of shoring up banks and a*bank run can happen very quickly.”
Take Note: If you like what this site has to offer go here to receive Your Daily Intelligence Report with links to the latest articles posted on It’s FREE! An easy �unsubscribe� feature is provided should you decide to cancel at any time.

Just as I explained here last week, the Times points out that it “was a similar liquidity crisis on Wall Street in September 2008 � which started with nervous investors pulling money from troubled institutions, then quickly from healthier ones � that set off the financial crisis.”

I repeat: It was just last Monday that I showed you how Europe and the U.S. are now on a collision course with a second Lehman-type megashock and here we are today, only seven days later, with the snowball of events bringing us a few steps closer.

Will This Time Be Worse Than 2008?

Politicians and investors all over the world are now trying to prepare for the inevitable consequences. What they don’t seem to realize is that the next major megashock could be more severe than the Lehman Brothers failure.

Never forget the key differences between then and now:
In 2008, it was strictly individual financial institutions that were on the edge of collapse. Today, entire nations are on the brink.
In 2008, the U.S. federal deficit of the prior fiscal year was $161 billion. Today, it’s $1.327 trillion, or 8.2 times larger.
In 2008, most of the megabanks at the epicenter of the crisis were in the United States. Today, although some U.S. megabanks are still taking excessive risk, it’s primarily the far LARGER European banks that are in the most trouble. In fact the weak European banks are so large, their total assets are greater than the total assets of ALL U.S. commercial banks combined.
In 2008, governments had not yet deployed their “big gun” cures for the debt crisis. So they still had the firing power to squelch the crisis with a series of unprecedented rescues. Today, we have seen the rapidly diminishing returns � or outright failure � of nearly every possible stimulus plan, bailout deal or austerity measures known to man.
In 2008, governments encountered little public resistance to major new policy initiatives. Today, millions of citizens are rebelling at the polls � or on the streets � in France, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and even Germany.
Most important, until late 2008, central banks restricted their role to traditional manipulation of interest rates. Now, however, four of the most powerful central banks in the world (the Fed, ECB, BOE and BOJ) have departed radically from tradition and embarked on the greatest wave of money printing in the history of mankind.
What REALLY Happened During -*and After the Lehman Collapse?

Over a single weekend in mid-September 2008, the Fed chairman, the Treasury secretary, and other high officials huddled at the New York Fed’s offices in downtown Manhattan to sseriously considered bailing out Lehman, but they ran into two hurdles:
Lehman’s assets were too sick � so diseased, in fact, even the federal government didn’t want to touch them with a 10-foot pole. Nor were there any private buyers remotely interested in a shotgun marriage.
Foreshadowing the public rebellion that would later bust onto the scene in the Tea Party movement, there was a new sentiment on Wall Street that was previously unheard of: a*small, but vocal, minority was getting sick and tired of bailouts. “Let them fail,” they said. “Teach those bastards a lesson!” was the new rallying cry.
For the Fed chairman and Treasury secretary, it was the long-dreaded day of reckoning. It was the fateful moment in history that demanded a life-or-death decision regarding one of the biggest financial institutions in the world � bigger than General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler put together. Should they save it? Or should they let it fail? Their decision: make a break with the past let Lehman fail.

As in the prior Bear Stearns failure, America’s largest banking conglomerate (JPMorgan Chase) promptly appeared on the scene and swooped up the outstanding trades and, as with Bear Stearns, the Fed acted as a backstop. Lehman’s demise was unique, however,*because it was thrown into bankruptcy and put on the chopping block for liquidation.

[You were forewarned of that collapse ] exactly 182 days earlier, when we warned that it could be the financial earthquake that would change the world and it was. Until that day, nearly everyone assumed that giant firms like Lehman were “too big to fail,” that the government would always step in to save them but that myth was shattered on September 15, 2008, when the U.S. government decided to abandon its long tradition of largesse and let Lehman go under -and that had major negative repercussuins:]
A major U.S. money market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, immediately suffered a direct hit in its portfolio from exposure to Lehman securities, pushing its share value below $1 � an unprecedented event that spread panic in the entire industry.
Money funds, mutual funds and other institutions refused to buy the short-term IOUs (commercial paper) that thousands of companies rely on for ready cash.
All over the world, investors recoiled in horror, abandoning short-term credit markets � the lifeblood of the global financial system.
Bank lending froze.
Borrowing costs went through the roof.
Corporate bonds tanked.
The entire world seemed like it was coming unglued.
“I guess we goofed!” were, in essence, the words of admission heard at the Fed and Treasury. “Now, instead of just a bailout for Lehman, what we’re really going to need is the Mother of All Bailouts � for the entire financial system.” The U.S. government promptly complied, delivering precisely what they asked for:
a $700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), rushed through Congress and signed into law by President Bush in record time and, in addition, loaned, invested, or committed
$300 billion to nationalize the world’s two largest mortgage companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
over $42 billion for the Big Three auto manufacturers,
$29 billion for Bear Stearns,
$150 billion for AIG, and $350 billion for Citigroup,
$300 billion for the Federal Housing Administration Rescue Bill to refinance bad mortgages,
$87 billion to pay back JPMorgan Chase for bad Lehman Brothers trades,
$200 billion in loans to banks under the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility (TAF),
$50 billion to support short-term corporate IOUs held by money market mutual funds,
$500 billion to rescue various credit markets,
$620 billion for foreign central banks,
trillions more to guarantee the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC’s) new, expanded bank deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000,
plus trillions more in bailouts and for other sweeping guarantees.
Governments of the UK and the European Union followed a similar pattern and everywhere, both inside and outside of government, apologists for these mega-rescues argued that it was “the lesser of the evils,” the only way to save the world from an even direr fate.

They were wrong, and we told them so on September 25, 2008 when Safe Money Report editor Mike Larson and I submitted a white paper to the U.S. Congress specifically documenting why the government bailouts would ultimately transform the debt crisis into a sovereign debt crisis. In effect, we argued, “Sure, governments can bail out big banks, brokers and insurers but when the next crisis strikes, who will bail out the governments?”…

Yes, with trillions in bailouts since the 2008 debt crisis, the governments of the U.S. and Europe were able to calm the waters and restore credit markets but no government anywhere can create wealth and prosperity with worthless paper, and no government can repeal the laws of gravity or change the laws of thermodynamics.


When investors sell bad government bonds, the value of those bonds must plunge, making it next to impossible for those governments to borrow. When savers run to safety, money must flood from the weakest banks to the strongest, making it impossible for the weak banks to survive. That’s what is happening now, and what will continue to happen in the weeks ahead, until (and unless) the authorities unleash a new wave of money printing that makes previous waves look puny by comparison.

Stand by for our team’s specific instructions on how to protect yourself and profit.

Good luck and God bless!


*…ext-49763**(To access the above article please copy the URL and paste it into your browser.)
Editor�s Note: The above article may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (�), and reformatted (including the title, some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. The article�s views and conclusions are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original article.

Related Articles:

1. Something Very Scary Could Be Just Months Away! Got Gold?

I think it�s important that everybody has a reasonable allocation of gold in their portfolio because�we could be just a few months away from something that is really very scary, and if that happens, gold will go a lot higher.

2. Economic Alert: If You�re Not Worried Yet�You Should Be

For the past four years I have been covering the progression of the global economic crisis with an emphasis on the debilitating effects it has had on the American financial system. Only once before have I ever issued an economic alert, and this was at the onset of the very first credit downgrade in U.S. history by S&P. I do not take the word �alert� lightly. [Read on to to understand why I have issued an economic alert once again.] Words: 1904

3. Here�s the �No BS� Situation with Europe � and Its BAD!

The media is rife with misrepresentations and analysis of the EU. Here�s the real deal, no BS situation with Europe � and its BAD! Words: 900

4. U.S. Financial Crisis Makes Future Rioting In The Streets An Almost Certain Outcome! Here�s Why

The U.S. government has put us between the proverbial �rock and a hard place�. Cutting spending to improve our country�s financial situation would surely trigger rioting in the streets by those Americans most adversely affected yet not cutting spending will trigger much higher inflation � even hyperinflation � which will also result in rioting�.Government cannot control how this ends. They may be able to tinker with the timing a bit and they still have the choice of poisons with which to destroy the country, [but] that the country is gone, that is no longer alterable. Words: 930

5. Kunstler: Wake up, Sleepyheads! Things are Heating Up

Europe may soon be choking on that plat du jour of government a la Hollandaise with the side of chopped Greek salad. The whole world, in fact, has got something like a giant hairball stuck in its craw. The hairball is composed of filaments of lies wound over a core of supernatural indebtedness. The lies are promises that the debt will be paid back. Words: 710

6. The Coming Crisis in Europe Will Result in a MAJOR CRISIS in the U.S.! Here�s Why

In this article I lay out precisely why the coming Crisis in Europe will be THE Crisis I�ve been forecasting for the last 24 months, why it will have dire consequences on the U.S. and why the Fed can do absolutely nothing to stop it this time round. Words: 1334

7. Ongoing European Crisis to Result in Higher Inflation and Higher Gold Prices � Here�s Why

On the surface things may appear to be calm, but I don�t think the European crisis is anywhere near its conclusion. Losses still have to be taken from Ireland, Spain, Portugal and possibly even Italy�There are a number of ways out of Europe�s problems. One of them is higher inflation�[which] is going to be very positive for gold� because the central banks will be under pressure to print.

8. European Election Results Harbinger of Future U.S. Elections � Here�s Why

The implications for the elections in Europe likely portend what will happen in the U.S.. A similar revolt against incumbents [will] �sweep Obama�out of office but� the newcomers will be placed in the position of Sarkozy and other European incumbents. They will have to address the insolvency and eventual liquidity issues in similar fashion which will be viewed here as �austerity� or worse, �cruel and unusual� punishment. [So, how likely is that? Not very, because] politicians, by nature, are not courageous animals. Instead we will see more of the same: half-assed attempts to fool the people into believing that something is being done to solve the problems. [So what does the future hold for America?] Words: 631

9. U.S. Gov�t Making Preperations for Expected Major Social Unrest Next Year

The Federal government is gearing up for unprecedented social unrest (worse than Greece or Spain) when Washington is forced to impose �austerity� plans next year� [which will be deemed absolutely necessary to avoid] runaway inflation [that would otherwise occur] to pay for the country�s costly welfare programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and massive unfunded liabilities. [Below are the preparations presently underway.] Words: 500

10. U.S. �Deficit Disorder� Means Broken Promises + Even More QE! Here�s Why


One of the problems with the debate over the �national debt� is that there�s no generally agreed upon definition of that term. Is it what the federal government owes, or what it owes foreigners, or what the whole country, private and public sector together, owes? Does it include off-balance-sheet items and contingent liabilities? There�s a hundred-trillion dollar gap between lowest and highest on this spectrum, which allows each commentator to confuse the rest of us by picking the measure that best suits their point of view. [Let’s try to decipher the true state of the nation.] Words: 1468

11. We Are Heading Deeper and Deeper Into Fiscal Insanity! Here�s Why

The definition of insanity is to continue doing something that goes wrong, without contemplating that there could be a different course of action�[and we] are heading deeper and deeper into insanity�we are just getting deeper and deeper into problems leaving our children and grandchildren with loans that could well take decades to finish (paying) off. I fear we are now stoking up the conditions, at some point in the future, for serious inflation.

12. Events Accelerating Towards an Ultimate Dollar Catastrophe! Here�s Why

With the U.S. election just nine months off, political pressures will mount to favor fiscal stimulus measures instead of restraint. Such action can only accelerate higher domestic inflation and intensified dollar debasement culminating in a Great Collapse � a hyperinflationary great depression � by 2014. [Let me explain why that is the inevitable outcome.] Words: 2766

13. Fed�s Actions Are a Path to Ruin NOT Prosperity! Here�s Why

Currency wars arise when a country steals growth from trading partners by cheapening its currency to promote exports. The new currency war began in 2010 when President Obama declared in his State of the Union address that it was the policy of the United States to double exports in five years. Since the U.S. would not become twice as productive in five years, the implication was the U.S. would severely cheapen its currency to achieve this goal. [Let me expand upon this.] Words: 666

14. Major Changes in Inflation, Interest Rates, �Taxes� and U.S. Dollar Coming

The economy is now so manipulated by politicians, big bankers, and special-interest groups that making sense of the markets has become an almost impossible feat. Which is to say, it must push even harder on the levers of its printing presses, further setting the stage for the massive period of inflation we continue to see as inevitable� and for a stunning rise in interest rates. Words: 968

15. The U.S. is Headed Toward a Complete and Utter Collapse of its Financial System

The U.S. is headed inexorably toward a systemic failure, a complete and utter collapse of the financial system. TARP and all the other machinations have not improved the underlying insolvency of the banking system. They have, however, deferred a collapse and ensured that it will ultimately be worse. [Let me explain.] Words: 1385
16. Get Ready for Financial Crisis 2.0 in 2012 � It�s Inevitable! Here�s Why

This analyst sees the perfect storm of converging criteria almost perfectly timed and aligned with the 2012 election cycle. When the moment arrives, the financial earthquake will rapidly demolish the existing highly precarious financial system. Government will stand by helpless, unable to shield itself, much less its vulnerable citizens or private financial institutions from the tsunami of debt and currency destruction. 2012 is shaping up to be the blockbuster main event of the ongoing financial crisis. Massive amounts of new debt, vast quantities of additional digital dollars and the spark of higher interest rates will set off version 2.0 of the credit-driven financial implosion. Let me explain. Words: 1443

Tom Fitzpatrick: Stocks to Go Down 27%, Bonds to Go Up to Extreme Levels, Gold to Remain Firm

A top analyst at Citibank has told King World News that global stock markets are set to plunge 27%. Fitzpatrick…the panic will move global bond markets to extreme levels, but gold will remain firm.

So says*Tom Fitzpatrick*in edited excerpts from an interview with King World News as provided by Lorimer Wilson, editor of (Your Key to Making Money!). This paragraph must be included in its entirety in any re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Specifically Fitzpatrick said, in part [you can read the full article here, complete with enlightening charts]:

“We think that, short-term,*the S&P 500 and the DJIA*will head down to their 200 day moving averages in a similar fashion to what we saw last year which would be*1277 and 12,000 respectively [Go here to see*his chart].

Comparing the market environment with that of ’73 to ’77….when we had a similar deterioration in housing, in the economy as well as in the U.S.*dollar, gold and the oil price shocks, and*sensing that we may have already put in the peak here, the suggestion is that the next down-move would be in the region of 27%. This could be a very quick move, in as little as four or five months.” [Go here to see his chart.]
Automatic Delivery Available! If you enjoy this site and would like every article sent automatically to you then go HERE and sign up to receive Your Daily Intelligence Report. We provide an easy “unsubscribe” feature should you decide to opt out at any time.

Spread the word. munKNEE should be in everybody’s inbox and MONEY in everybody’s wallet!
Related Articles:

1. Marc Faber: We Could Have a Crash Like in 1987 This Fall! Here’s Why

Marc Faber has stated in an interview* on Bloomberg Television that “I think the market will have difficulties to move up strongly unless we have a massive QE3 (something Faber thinks would “definitely occur” if the S&P 500 dropped another 100 to 150 points. If it bounces back to 1,400, he said, the Fed will probably wait to see how the economy develops)….. If the market makes a new high, it will be with very few stocks pushing up and the majority of stocks having already rolled over….If it moves and makes a high above 1,422, the second half of the year could witness a crash, like in 1987.” Words: 708

2. Pento: Markets Will Fall Significantly This Summer – Here’s Why

Investors are being told that the worsening sovereign debt crisis in Europe will leave the U.S. economy unscathed….[because,] since we don’t make many things to export to Europe, our GDP won’t suffer a significant decline at all…. What [has been] conveniently overlooked, [however’] is the fact that 40% of S&P 500 earnings are derived from foreign economies and the seventeen countries that make up the Eurozone have collapsed into recession. [Let me explain what effect that will have on the performance of the S&P 500 this summer.] Words: 325

3. Charles Nenner: Dow to Peak in 2012 and Then Decline to 5,000!

Charles Nenner has been accurately predicting movements in the liquid markets for more than 25 years, and his most recent cycle analysis predicts that the current stock market rally is going to last through Q2 and then begin a major descent in 2013 – with the Dow eventually reaching 5,000! Read on to learn how Nenner’s unique system works and what he forecasts for commodities, currencies, bonds, interest rates and more. Words: 400

4. NOW Is the Time to Get Out of the Stock Market! Here’s Why

With the S&P 500 at its highest level since the summer of 2008, investors previously sidelined by reoccurring fears of a double dip recession and nagging worries about a disorderly Greek default may now be tempted to hold their noses and dive into the market where, presumably, they will be swept along to the land of outsized profits by the Dow 13,000 wave. Having said this, it is worth noting that often the best time to sell is when everyone else is buying. Now may be that time. [Let me explain.] Words: 885

5. S&P 500 Should Continue Climbing Until October and Then Decline 15-30%! – Here’s Why

At the end of November 2011 the U.S. behavioral indicator for the U.S. stock market, based on insights on investor psychology, touched the crisis threshold for the fifth time (1971,1979, 1986, 2006) since 1970. If the current case follows the four prior cases, we expect a similar positive return from November 2011 to the end of October 2012 as in the four prior periods followed by a decline somewhere between 15% and 30%. [Let me explain.] Words: 317

6. Fractal Analysis Suggests Dow Could Drop to 6,000 in 2012 and Gold Take Off Like It In 1979

[While] I do not prescribe to the 2012 end of the world or end of an era phenomenon, my recent fractal (pattern) analysis of the Dow suggests that it is forming a similar pattern to that which was formed in the late 60s to early 70s and if this pattern continues in a similar manner…the Dow could indeed have an annus horribilis (horrible year) in 2012. Let me explain. Words: 1416

7. Dr. Nu Yu: Developing Trends in Gold, Silver and Mining Companies to Remain VERY Bearish! Here’s Why

This analysis is an all-encompassing look at the developing trends in gold, silver, the HUI and XAU indices, West Texas crude oil, the US Dollar Index, 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds and the U.S. and Chinese stock markets. It is not a pretty sight! Words: 1428